- TightPoker Strategy Forum ‹ Tournament Poker ‹ Single Table Tournaments (STT)
- Official Forum of the Party Poker Strategy Guide
- Print view
Winning SNG stats
Single table tournament strategy and discussionModerators: ihatejacks, Section Moderators, Moderators
Winning SNG stats
by scottie_g » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:28 pm
Could someone that is a winning SNG player post some stats about your play? (Heids, Dday,
)
ROI, ITM, other usefull stats...
Also, how is the skill level at the various limits, $11, $22, $33, $55, $109 SNG's?
ROI, ITM, other usefull stats...
Also, how is the skill level at the various limits, $11, $22, $33, $55, $109 SNG's?
-

scottie_g - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:04 am
by fishdawg65 » Sun Dec 04, 2005 8:51 pm
11: Good Solid players thrive here but can be sucked out by fish.
ROI: 27.53
Fin. in $: 37
Avg. Finish: 4.91
22: Less fish mean that more solid players but can still thrive.
ROI: 48.76
Fin. in $: 50
Avg. Finish: 4.5
What other stats do you want?
ROI: 27.53
Fin. in $: 37
Avg. Finish: 4.91
22: Less fish mean that more solid players but can still thrive.
ROI: 48.76
Fin. in $: 50
Avg. Finish: 4.5
What other stats do you want?
-

fishdawg65 - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:56 am
by fishdawg65 » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:33 pm
I've heard 25% ROI is considered good for players who multi-table.
I don't multi-table. I like to play one at a time until I start getting better at multi-tabling.
I don't multi-table. I like to play one at a time until I start getting better at multi-tabling.
-

fishdawg65 - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:56 am
Sng stats
by Dday44 » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:44 pm
Hi!
In regards to ITM Distribution- ideally I believe that your ITM should look like a ladder- i.e. more 1sts than 2nds, more 2nds than 3rds.
Multitabling(4 at time), once you get to a high skill level, you can maintain a longterm ROI at 20% or better- but not that much better- and let's face it a 20% ROI is something almost all investors in the world would take
I 8 tabled the 50s for almost 5k games before I moved to the 100s and had an ROI close to 25% at that level.
Hope this is helpful.
All the best, Dave
In regards to ITM Distribution- ideally I believe that your ITM should look like a ladder- i.e. more 1sts than 2nds, more 2nds than 3rds.
Multitabling(4 at time), once you get to a high skill level, you can maintain a longterm ROI at 20% or better- but not that much better- and let's face it a 20% ROI is something almost all investors in the world would take
I 8 tabled the 50s for almost 5k games before I moved to the 100s and had an ROI close to 25% at that level.
Hope this is helpful.
All the best, Dave
- Dday44
by scottie_g » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:45 pm
I didn't multi-table when I first started playing SNG's.. I've been 2 tabling the $22's at Pokerroom and it's been fun so far. Most of the early stages in a SNG involve fold, fold, fold, so 2 tabling isn't that hard to do.
What's fun is when you are on the bubble on 2 tables (or like 6 if ur Dday). Definitely a stressful time.
What's fun is when you are on the bubble on 2 tables (or like 6 if ur Dday). Definitely a stressful time.
-

scottie_g - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:04 am
by hiho » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:07 pm
fishdawg65 wrote:11: Good Solid players thrive here but can be sucked out by fish.
ROI: 27.53
Fin. in $: 37
Avg. Finish: 4.91
22: Less fish mean that more solid players but can still thrive.
ROI: 48.76
Fin. in $: 50
Avg. Finish: 4.5
What other stats do you want?
Interesting that you're doing better in the 22 than the 11, you really think that it is because of a fish suck out?
-

hiho - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1068
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:15 am
by scottie_g » Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:07 am
hiho wrote:fishdawg65 wrote:11: Good Solid players thrive here but can be sucked out by fish.
ROI: 27.53
Fin. in $: 37
Avg. Finish: 4.91
22: Less fish mean that more solid players but can still thrive.
ROI: 48.76
Fin. in $: 50
Avg. Finish: 4.5
What other stats do you want?
Interesting that you're doing better in the 22 than the 11, you really think that it is because of a fish suck out?
Most likely it is sample size related.
BTW, I find the players (at least at Pokerroom) at the $22's to be pretty bad most of the time. When it gets down to last 3, you see the better players.
-

scottie_g - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:04 am
by faquewdikhed » Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:47 pm
scottie_g wrote:So whats a good benchmark for an ITM number Dday?
45% is phenomenal... perhaps unsustainable
-

faquewdikhed - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 829
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:40 pm
by heids » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:11 pm
Hey Scotty_g
Some time back I posted what a solid player could expect for an ROI at each level. I don't remember exactly what I stated so I'll probably contradict myself, but I think the below table is pretty representative of real world.
Assumptions: The player is very solid.
Maximum Longterm Sustainable ROI (1000+ Tournaments at each level)
$5 Tables - 40-45%
$10 Tables - 35-40%
$20 Tables - 30-35%
$30 Tables - 25-30%
$50 Tables - 20-25%
$100 Tables - 15-20%
$200 Tables - 10-15%
For a real world example, after 590 $100 tournaments, my ROI is 27.5% and after 94 $200 tables my ROI is 29%.
Some time back I posted what a solid player could expect for an ROI at each level. I don't remember exactly what I stated so I'll probably contradict myself, but I think the below table is pretty representative of real world.
Assumptions: The player is very solid.
Maximum Longterm Sustainable ROI (1000+ Tournaments at each level)
$5 Tables - 40-45%
$10 Tables - 35-40%
$20 Tables - 30-35%
$30 Tables - 25-30%
$50 Tables - 20-25%
$100 Tables - 15-20%
$200 Tables - 10-15%
For a real world example, after 590 $100 tournaments, my ROI is 27.5% and after 94 $200 tables my ROI is 29%.
- heids
- TightPoker.com Tutor
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:49 pm
Re: Sng stats
by heids » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:16 pm
Dday44 wrote:
I 8 tabled the 50s for almost 5k games before I moved to the 100s and had an ROI close to 25% at that level.
5000 STTs? Damn, man - when do you take a piss?
had an ROI close to 25% at that level.
By the way, nice stat.
- heids
- TightPoker.com Tutor
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:49 pm
Re: Sng stats
by scottie_g » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:08 pm
Heids wrote:Dday44 wrote:
I 8 tabled the 50s for almost 5k games before I moved to the 100s and had an ROI close to 25% at that level.
5000 STTs? Damn, man - when do you take a piss?had an ROI close to 25% at that level.
By the way, nice stat.
Heids, do you multi table?
-

scottie_g - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:04 am
by hiho » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:23 pm
are these win rates, ROI, ITM from playing party SitnGoes or ANY of them such as at stars, poker room ect. I should think that some people would perfer to stay away from the all in donk fest that party presents to keep their winrates.
-

hiho - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1068
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:15 am
25 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Single Table Tournaments (STT)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests





