- TightPoker Strategy Forum ‹ Tournament Poker ‹ Single Table Tournaments (STT)
- Official Forum of the Party Poker Strategy Guide
- Print view
variance or do I suck
Single table tournament strategy and discussionModerators: ihatejacks, Section Moderators, Moderators
by ugignadl » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:25 pm
It depends on the stack sizes of the other people at the table, but I agree with that ML. Some make it M < 7 is instapush, but they are almost the same anyway, depending on how shorthanded you are.
If you are willing, it might be better to just post a full HH of an SNG (maybe a short one, turbo). That might be easier to comment on, unless you feel that your early game is perfect.
If you are willing, it might be better to just post a full HH of an SNG (maybe a short one, turbo). That might be easier to comment on, unless you feel that your early game is perfect.
-

ugignadl - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:33 am
by mewsiclovr » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:30 pm
Sure, I don't mind. Actually, I might prefer that, might help identify where I'm going wrong. It won't be converted though (ugly).
Keep an eye out.
Keep an eye out.
-

mewsiclovr - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:20 am
by LadyWrestler » Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:32 pm
Ugignadl wrote:It depends on the stack sizes of the other people at the table, but I agree with that ML. Some make it M < 7 is instapush, but they are almost the same anyway, depending on how shorthanded you are.
If you are willing, it might be better to just post a full HH of an SNG (maybe a short one, turbo). That might be easier to comment on, unless you feel that your early game is perfect.
Great idea, Ugignadl!
- LadyWrestler
by darinvg » Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:48 am
1, AJ: good push
2, AJ: good
3, AJ: auto
4, KQ: seems fine unless he’s super tight
5, KQ: good
6, KQ: I usually fold to the raise here especially since I’m not in a blind. I don’t think calling is really bad but I like my 1st in vigorish.
7, A9: yep, push it.
8, 77: easy, any pair, A, K, Q etc
9, JJ: come on, you’re just frustrated.
10, AJs: I like this call. (much better than KQ)
11, AK: auto
As far as varience vs do I suck. I blamed varience for a long time before I figured out I had a lot of leaks. At the low levels you shouldn't really drop more than 30 buyins. Also, post you finish distribution. I might be able to see something there.
2, AJ: good
3, AJ: auto
4, KQ: seems fine unless he’s super tight
5, KQ: good
6, KQ: I usually fold to the raise here especially since I’m not in a blind. I don’t think calling is really bad but I like my 1st in vigorish.
7, A9: yep, push it.
8, 77: easy, any pair, A, K, Q etc
9, JJ: come on, you’re just frustrated.
10, AJs: I like this call. (much better than KQ)
11, AK: auto
As far as varience vs do I suck. I blamed varience for a long time before I figured out I had a lot of leaks. At the low levels you shouldn't really drop more than 30 buyins. Also, post you finish distribution. I might be able to see something there.
-

darinvg - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:46 pm
by mewsiclovr » Wed Nov 29, 2006 10:34 am
What kind of leaks did you find? I'm not even really sure what I should be looking for.
Here's my finish distribution at PS (I finally figured out how to access my PT db from work!):
1 - 11.06%
2 - 12.9%
3 - 15.97%
4 - 15.13%
5 - 16.81%
6 - 12.61%
7 - 7.56%
8 - 4.76%
9 - 2.95%
So I go out a lot either on the bubble or in third and I think it's killing me.
Here's my finish distribution at PS (I finally figured out how to access my PT db from work!):
1 - 11.06%
2 - 12.9%
3 - 15.97%
4 - 15.13%
5 - 16.81%
6 - 12.61%
7 - 7.56%
8 - 4.76%
9 - 2.95%
So I go out a lot either on the bubble or in third and I think it's killing me.
-

mewsiclovr - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:20 am
by darinvg » Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:32 am
MewsicLovr wrote:What kind of leaks did you find? I'm not even really sure what I should be looking for.
Here's my finish distribution at PS (I finally figured out how to access my PT db from work!):
1 - 11.06%
2 - 12.9%
3 - 15.97%
4 - 15.13%
5 - 16.81%
6 - 12.61%
7 - 7.56%
8 - 4.76%
9 - 2.95%
So I go out a lot either on the bubble or in third and I think it's killing me.
Those look like my old stats. 1<2<3 = no good.
My game:
Major leak #1: not pushing enough. there are tons of good spots w/ marginal cards when the blinds get big.
Major leak #3: weak bubble
Major leak #2: not calling enough when I'm short. sometimes you have to take you flips w/ hands like 77.
-

darinvg - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 2:46 pm
by Linuxrocks » Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:26 pm
sfustsh wrote:God that's a lot of hands, here goes
1: 15 BB, what the hell are you doing shoving? I prefer 600 and I can call a shove with reads.
2: Another Headsup no no
3: This one's fine since you have a little over 4 BB
4: This one you gotta call with the blinds so huge, his range is nearly ATC
5: You realize that with SEVEN people left the blinds are not as huge as they are with 4, so a shove here is unneccessary. In fact I even prefer a limp to a raise with this hand, with folding the best option.
6: Little more standard.
7: This one seems alright too
8: Fine with 4 BB
9: Once UTG folds this is an good move. It's an even BETTER move if he's just to your left, since he'll call and likely shut out anyone else. Either way it wouldn't take 8 BB to get my money in with Jacks, I'd play this hand strong with 15+ BB. But I just love jacks =)
10: Here I actually prefer a fold. Again it's 7 handed so you're not in the danger zone, and it's already been opened so you don't get any FE.
11: Okay after his minraise.
OMG. This post is wrong on so many levels that I am going to say "No information is better than mis-information".
Agree totally with what Darin said above. There are lot more leaks in one's play until one investigates
- Linuxrocks
by sfustsh » Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:01 am
ppadala wrote:sfustsh wrote:God that's a lot of hands, here goes
1: 15 BB, what the hell are you doing shoving? I prefer 600 and I can call a shove with reads.
2: Another Headsup no no
3: This one's fine since you have a little over 4 BB
4: This one you gotta call with the blinds so huge, his range is nearly ATC
5: You realize that with SEVEN people left the blinds are not as huge as they are with 4, so a shove here is unneccessary. In fact I even prefer a limp to a raise with this hand, with folding the best option.
6: Little more standard.
7: This one seems alright too
8: Fine with 4 BB
9: Once UTG folds this is an good move. It's an even BETTER move if he's just to your left, since he'll call and likely shut out anyone else. Either way it wouldn't take 8 BB to get my money in with Jacks, I'd play this hand strong with 15+ BB. But I just love jacks =)
10: Here I actually prefer a fold. Again it's 7 handed so you're not in the danger zone, and it's already been opened so you don't get any FE.
11: Okay after his minraise.
OMG. This post is wrong on so many levels that I am going to say "No information is better than mis-information".
Agree totally with what Darin said above. There are lot more leaks in one's play until one investigates
LOL, I'm seriously going to stop posting here, ever. I always seem to wrong about everything.
-

sfustsh - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:57 pm
33 posts • Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to Single Table Tournaments (STT)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




