- TightPoker Strategy Forum ‹ Limit and No Limit Poker ‹ (High Stakes) No Limit Texas Hold'em
- Official Forum of the Party Poker Strategy Guide
- Print view
Sillyness at NL100?
NL100+ and PL100+ poker strategy and discussionModerators: ihatejacks, Section Moderators, Moderators
Sillyness at NL100?
by ugignadl » Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:10 am
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, December 27, 01:58:35 ET 2006
Table Jackpot #1305491 (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: VariousSpace ( $89.80 )
Seat 2: jonasnr ( $95.15 )
Seat 3: danhydepark ( $123.15 )
Seat 4: SharkingFish ( $251.72 )
Seat 5: samson48 ( $11.10 )
Seat 7: skaife74 ( $50.65 )
Seat 8: frugalboy ( $87.80 )
Seat 9: Ugignadl ( $120.45 )
Seat 10: fatlipjesus9 ( $152.75 )
Seat 6: ODB235 ( $18.50 )
Ugignadl posts small blind [$0.50].
fatlipjesus9: i called
fatlipjesus9 posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Ugignadl [
]
jonasnr calls [$1]
danhydepark folds
SharkingFish calls [$1]
samson48 calls [$1]
ODB235 folds
skaife74 folds
Ugignadl raises [$5.50] I thought this was $6
fatlipjesus9 folds
jonasnr folds
SharkingFish calls [$5]
samson48 folds
** Dealing Flop ** [
,
,
]
Ugignadl bets [$10]
SharkingFish raises [$20] 30/7
Ugignadl raises [$40] misclick, meant to raise $60
SharkingFish calls [$30]
** Dealing Turn ** [
]
Ugignadl is all-In [$64.45]
Thoughts?
Table Jackpot #1305491 (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: VariousSpace ( $89.80 )
Seat 2: jonasnr ( $95.15 )
Seat 3: danhydepark ( $123.15 )
Seat 4: SharkingFish ( $251.72 )
Seat 5: samson48 ( $11.10 )
Seat 7: skaife74 ( $50.65 )
Seat 8: frugalboy ( $87.80 )
Seat 9: Ugignadl ( $120.45 )
Seat 10: fatlipjesus9 ( $152.75 )
Seat 6: ODB235 ( $18.50 )
Ugignadl posts small blind [$0.50].
fatlipjesus9: i called
fatlipjesus9 posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Ugignadl [
]
jonasnr calls [$1]
danhydepark folds
SharkingFish calls [$1]
samson48 calls [$1]
ODB235 folds
skaife74 folds
Ugignadl raises [$5.50] I thought this was $6
fatlipjesus9 folds
jonasnr folds
SharkingFish calls [$5]
samson48 folds
** Dealing Flop ** [
,
,
]
Ugignadl bets [$10]
SharkingFish raises [$20] 30/7
Ugignadl raises [$40] misclick, meant to raise $60
SharkingFish calls [$30]
** Dealing Turn ** [
]
Ugignadl is all-In [$64.45]
Thoughts?
-

ugignadl - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:33 am
by mervhage » Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:06 am
Mirage wrote:I like it, I think he's on a flush draw and he obviously missed the turn, may as well stick it in now while you've still got some FE.
I think it's more likely he has a Queen with a weaker kicker, maybe? Just as well, he could be on a flush draw. Either way, if you make it $60 on the flop, then push the turn or, play it as you did seems fine to me.
-

mervhage - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:12 am
by cavman » Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:59 pm
do you have any reads about yourself or villain, and how often had you been raising big from the blinds?
i don't really know how full ring or NL 100 plays, but i don't like 3-betting the flop. Most people don't raise much from the blinds, and it really shows a lot of strength. so i think he's got a very strong hand here. but, basically the only hands you're behind are 33 and QT. there are a lot of drawing hands, but you have the
so that eliminates some. i'd just call the raise on the flop and see a turn, and usually check the turn. on the flop, if you are ahead it's probably only a slight lead, but if you're behind, you're crushed. i'd be trying to play for pot control.
if you had a read this guy was bad or overaggressive and were sure you wanted to go to the felt, then i like how you played it.
i don't really know how full ring or NL 100 plays, but i don't like 3-betting the flop. Most people don't raise much from the blinds, and it really shows a lot of strength. so i think he's got a very strong hand here. but, basically the only hands you're behind are 33 and QT. there are a lot of drawing hands, but you have the
so that eliminates some. i'd just call the raise on the flop and see a turn, and usually check the turn. on the flop, if you are ahead it's probably only a slight lead, but if you're behind, you're crushed. i'd be trying to play for pot control.
if you had a read this guy was bad or overaggressive and were sure you wanted to go to the felt, then i like how you played it.
-

cavman - Shark
- Posts: 485
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:35 pm
by ugignadl » Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:22 pm
My table image was unlucky TAG.
The only reads I had on villain was that he was 30/7, like I mentioned in the OP. I also had ``sticky?'' in the player notes. It was only my 50th hand or so at the table.
It isn't standard for me to rrf here.
The only reads I had on villain was that he was 30/7, like I mentioned in the OP. I also had ``sticky?'' in the player notes. It was only my 50th hand or so at the table.
It isn't standard for me to rrf here.
-

ugignadl - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:33 am
by poormanbilly » Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:33 pm
Ugignadl wrote:Anyone else care to comment before I post the results of this hand?
I think it's a tough spot either way. It sorta looks like a set, but it's so hard to tell. You've put a lot of chips in, so a fold is hard now. Still, you being able to fold marginal hands is an advantage you have over the people at this level. You could make a case either way. How unhelpful is that?
-

poormanbilly - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1714
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:12 am
by sfustsh » Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Ugignadl wrote:Preflop? You don't raise AQ? Seems like a leak.
Anyway! No comments on flop, turn action??
Thanks PMB for nothing.
LOL, I guess so, just reinforcing my weak/tight style I guess.
I DO however raise AQs.
-

sfustsh - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:57 pm
by goofyballer » Sun Dec 31, 2006 7:46 am
I would raise more preflop. OOP in full ring, you either want to entice people to fold or just complete here. So, I'd make it $7 (when in the blinds, generally I raise however much I would raise if I were on the button and the same number of people limped to me). This is a pretty good flop, I'd probably lead harder due to the drawy nature (pot is like $16 at that point? I'd lead $14 there). Once he min-raises though...it gets tough. I had a similar hand (mine was an overpair OOP against a small flop raise on a drawy board) which I posted on 2+2 yesterday and people suggested calling the flop raise and bet/folding the turn, which I think is a good line. You'll rarely get raised again on the turn unless villain has a huge hand and you get to keep villain from checking behind with a draw.
-

goofyballer - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3790
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 11:58 pm
by ihatejacks » Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:28 am
QJ of hearts obv, and he just nailed the straight draw. All that money in the pot you have to call and win if he misses all his outs on the river. I'd say it was almost coin flip situation for the river card (7 outs for the flush, 3 for a 2 pair, 4 for the straight).
-

ihatejacks - Site Admin
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:28 pm
29 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to (High Stakes) No Limit Texas Hold'em
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests





