- TightPoker Strategy Forum ‹ Limit and No Limit Poker ‹ (Small Stakes) No Limit Texas Hold'em
- Official Forum of the Party Poker Strategy Guide
- Print view
Insta-fold or what
NL25/50 and PL25/50 poker strategy and discussionModerators: ihatejacks, Section Moderators, Moderators
Insta-fold or what
by mervhage » Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:00 pm
This is the very first hand at this table.
***** Hand History for Game 5300744011 *****
$25 NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, October 02, 21:34:46 ET 2006
Table Table 107951 (No DP) (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: PayHerePlease ( $23.65 )
Seat 2: danakes ( $46.03 )
Seat 3: D_200 ( $40.63 )
Seat 5: bryanh888 ( $17.99 )
Seat 4: mervhage ( $25 )
Seat 6: EZsMustang ( $24.75 )
D_200 posts small blind [$0.10].
mervhage posts big blind [$0.25].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to mervhage [
]
bryanh888 raises [$2.17].
EZsMustang folds.
PayHerePlease folds.
danakes raises [$5].
D_200 folds.
mervhage????
My initial action was going to be to raise the UTG to ~$4.50 to $5. I always reraise with AK and have been very successful in doing so, by defining my hand and going from there. Anyhow, button reraise changes a lot, should I just fold or what??
Results below:
mervhage folds.
bryanh888 calls [$2.83].
** Dealing Flop ** [
,
,
]
bryanh888 checks.
danakes bets [$10].
bryanh888 is all-In [$12.99]
danakes calls [$2.99].
** Dealing Turn ** [
]
** Dealing River ** [
]
danakes shows [
,
] a flush, ace high.
bryanh888 doesn't show [
,
] two pairs, aces and nines.
danakes wins $34.53 from the main pot with a flush, ace high.
wtf
Idiots.
***** Hand History for Game 5300744011 *****
$25 NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, October 02, 21:34:46 ET 2006
Table Table 107951 (No DP) (Real Money)
Seat 2 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: PayHerePlease ( $23.65 )
Seat 2: danakes ( $46.03 )
Seat 3: D_200 ( $40.63 )
Seat 5: bryanh888 ( $17.99 )
Seat 4: mervhage ( $25 )
Seat 6: EZsMustang ( $24.75 )
D_200 posts small blind [$0.10].
mervhage posts big blind [$0.25].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to mervhage [
]
bryanh888 raises [$2.17].
EZsMustang folds.
PayHerePlease folds.
danakes raises [$5].
D_200 folds.
mervhage????
My initial action was going to be to raise the UTG to ~$4.50 to $5. I always reraise with AK and have been very successful in doing so, by defining my hand and going from there. Anyhow, button reraise changes a lot, should I just fold or what??
Results below:
mervhage folds.
bryanh888 calls [$2.83].
** Dealing Flop ** [
,
,
]
bryanh888 checks.
danakes bets [$10].
bryanh888 is all-In [$12.99]
danakes calls [$2.99].
** Dealing Turn ** [
]
** Dealing River ** [
]
danakes shows [
,
] a flush, ace high.
bryanh888 doesn't show [
,
] two pairs, aces and nines.
danakes wins $34.53 from the main pot with a flush, ace high.
wtf
Idiots.
-

mervhage - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:12 am
by sfustsh » Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:41 am
I tend to let that go because you need to raise fairly significantly to force out bryanh888. AK is a great hand but not a favorite against pairs, especially two. Obviously, you didn't know that but I fold most of the time in the BB, especially two bet. I don't think raising is too bad of a move, but calling is out of the question.
I really like how bryanh888 went all in with two overcards. He must have a good job to support his gambling losses.
I really like how bryanh888 went all in with two overcards. He must have a good job to support his gambling losses.
-

sfustsh - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:57 pm
by easy_as_pie » Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:59 am
stats and or image on both villains helps?
danakes raise looks scary because he is raising a UTG player but i think that if he had anything "good" he will raise much more then $5. Therefore, I at call or 4-bet (all depending on the images/stats of each villain)
danakes raise looks scary because he is raising a UTG player but i think that if he had anything "good" he will raise much more then $5. Therefore, I at call or 4-bet (all depending on the images/stats of each villain)
-

easy_as_pie - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:36 am
by ugignadl » Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:22 am
Just specifically on your move preflop...this is extremely read dependent. If I had absolutely no feeling at all on the players then I reraise again.
I'd make it ~$10 to go.
*edit: Crap, $25NL? I guess you have to fold. How boner.
I'd make it ~$10 to go.
*edit: Crap, $25NL? I guess you have to fold. How boner.
-

ugignadl - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:33 am
by neverthink » Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:25 am
I'd shove it or fold it, dpends on my mood and their play. Shows how much importance position plays in a hand.
- neverthink
- Whale Hunter
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 10:39 pm
by nlman » Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:10 pm
Shoving it all in should give me great odds, but it would be very read dependent (as many people already mentioned). If the one who reraised it is very tight, I'll assume that he has AA or KK and fold. If the first one has like 2% PFR, I'll fold too
But generally (with most of the other hands), I hate being stuck between 2 preflop raisers, so I'll usually fold.
But generally (with most of the other hands), I hate being stuck between 2 preflop raisers, so I'll usually fold.
- nlman
- Shark
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:48 pm
by mewsiclovr » Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:15 pm
If this is your first hand I'm pretty sure shoving is bad, since players tend to not believe people who have just sat down and will likely not fold their pair.
My .02.
My .02.
-

mewsiclovr - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:20 am
by nlman » Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:27 pm
MewsicLovr wrote:If this is your first hand I'm pretty sure shoving is bad, since players tend to not believe people who have just sat down and will likely not fold their pair.
This isn't a bluff! AKs is one of the best hands. It doesn't matter what they do:
1) If they fold, I'll win it right away.
2) If one of them calls I'll have about 50% chance to double up (UNLESS he has AA or KK, of course).
3) If both of them call I'll have even better odds, I think, because I'll have like 40% chance to 3x my money (UNLESS one of them has AA or KK, of course).
As you can see, the odds are great IF they don't have AA or KK. And that is where your read comes into play.
- nlman
- Shark
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:48 pm
by mervhage » Tue Oct 03, 2006 1:34 pm
I was fairly close to shoving. I think the reason I didn't is b/c I'd hate to lose a buyin on the first hand (no telling what 77 would have done if I shoved and UTG called), whereas I usually manage to double up through somebody at some point. I guess I figured I'd take my chances and wait.
I also like what neverthink said, sometimes these decisions are mood-dependent!
I also like what neverthink said, sometimes these decisions are mood-dependent!
-

mervhage - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 5859
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:12 am
by easy_as_pie » Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:53 pm
i think that shoving with AK is pretty bad in NL but people do it a lot.
its a tourney mentality and you will get called by better hands for sure.
its a tourney mentality and you will get called by better hands for sure.
-

easy_as_pie - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 1346
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 12:36 am
by sfustsh » Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:52 pm
easy_as_pie wrote:i think that shoving with AK is pretty bad in NL but people do it a lot.
its a tourney mentality and you will get called by better hands for sure.
There aren't many hands that are better than AKs. In fact the only hands that are for sure better are AA and KK. All other hands are losers or a coin flip at best (AK races against pocket pairs).
That said, I don't like to put my money on AKs against two raisers in a cash game. If I was going to play this, I'd have to shove, because you don't have position. You CANNOT call here, you have bad position and you haven't done anything but forfieted the aggression in the hand.
-

sfustsh - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:57 pm
by mewsiclovr » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:05 pm
sfustsh wrote:There aren't many hands that are better than AKs. In fact the only hands that are for sure better are AA and KK. All other hands are losers or a coin flip at best (AK races against pocket pairs).
That's exactly the line of thought that causes AK to be severely overplayed. No matter how you look at it it is still a drawing hand and usually needs help to win.
-

mewsiclovr - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 3418
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 8:20 am
by sfustsh » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:28 pm
MewsicLovr wrote:sfustsh wrote:There aren't many hands that are better than AKs. In fact the only hands that are for sure better are AA and KK. All other hands are losers or a coin flip at best (AK races against pocket pairs).
That's exactly the line of thought that causes AK to be severely overplayed. No matter how you look at it it is still a drawing hand and usually needs help to win.
Just to clarify, I agree with you. It just happens to be the strongest drawing hand there is. That's why I said earlier that I don't like to call with 2 raisers.
For tournaments, I push here all the time early. It's a make or break play but you're getting the best of it.
-

sfustsh - Whale Hunter
- Posts: 2127
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:57 pm
22 posts • Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to (Small Stakes) No Limit Texas Hold'em
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests




