britney spears crotch flashes ********NSFW ********
Moderators: ihatejacks, Section Moderators, Moderators
21 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by dudepoker171 » Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:16 pm
This explains it all, Britney is allergic to panties:
Washington, Dec 1(ANI): Not only have they found their place in tabloids, but persistent sightings of Britney Spears' crotch flashing have also become a hot topic of discussion among allergy experts all across the US. While some debate that the pop diva is actually allergic to underpants-polyester, cotton, latex or otherwise, others doubt her intentions behind exposing her bare bits, saying all she appears interested in these days is showing off her booty while out partying with her pals. "Commonly, a lot of underwear is often made out of polyester, which is not a natural fabric," said Dr. Ted Edwards of the Allergy Expert Website. "And a lot of people have a reaction to that," Dr. Edwards added. Edwards also says underpants are mostly matters of modesty, their use entirely optional. And in some cases, such as rashes, the only option might be to go without them for a while. "I would guarantee you there's several hundred thousand people out there doing the same thing [Spears did]. But no one cares about them," he said. In the past week, a part of Spears' anatomy has been captured on film on three separate occasions, the latest incident occurring on Tuesday night at a Malibu gas station that is apparently popular with paparazzi. According to Harry Finley, who has researched the history of underpants for his Website, the Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health, Spears' crotchless lifestyle is a throwback. "No women [wore underpants] up to a certain point," E!Online quoted Finley, as saying. "All men and women wore a kind of chemise-a long undershirt-with nothing underneath. That was their underwear. Obviously, if you wore a lot of outer clothing you can get away with more," Finley added. The next help comes courtesy Ginger Burr, who runs the Boston-based company Total Image Consultants. However as a personal image consultant, Burr is at a loss to explain Spears' new away-with-Underoos look. "One time you can understand. Two times-I don't know. It's crazy. I wouldn't recommend anyone wear a short skirt and no underwea," said Burr. But while others seem concerned, it's not that the diva is ignorant of this. Souces say that Spears took shopping matters into her own hands on Tuesday afternoon at Le Bra Lingerie, and splurged 3,000 dollars on underthings.(ANI)
Washington, Dec 1(ANI): Not only have they found their place in tabloids, but persistent sightings of Britney Spears' crotch flashing have also become a hot topic of discussion among allergy experts all across the US. While some debate that the pop diva is actually allergic to underpants-polyester, cotton, latex or otherwise, others doubt her intentions behind exposing her bare bits, saying all she appears interested in these days is showing off her booty while out partying with her pals. "Commonly, a lot of underwear is often made out of polyester, which is not a natural fabric," said Dr. Ted Edwards of the Allergy Expert Website. "And a lot of people have a reaction to that," Dr. Edwards added. Edwards also says underpants are mostly matters of modesty, their use entirely optional. And in some cases, such as rashes, the only option might be to go without them for a while. "I would guarantee you there's several hundred thousand people out there doing the same thing [Spears did]. But no one cares about them," he said. In the past week, a part of Spears' anatomy has been captured on film on three separate occasions, the latest incident occurring on Tuesday night at a Malibu gas station that is apparently popular with paparazzi. According to Harry Finley, who has researched the history of underpants for his Website, the Museum of Menstruation and Women's Health, Spears' crotchless lifestyle is a throwback. "No women [wore underpants] up to a certain point," E!Online quoted Finley, as saying. "All men and women wore a kind of chemise-a long undershirt-with nothing underneath. That was their underwear. Obviously, if you wore a lot of outer clothing you can get away with more," Finley added. The next help comes courtesy Ginger Burr, who runs the Boston-based company Total Image Consultants. However as a personal image consultant, Burr is at a loss to explain Spears' new away-with-Underoos look. "One time you can understand. Two times-I don't know. It's crazy. I wouldn't recommend anyone wear a short skirt and no underwea," said Burr. But while others seem concerned, it's not that the diva is ignorant of this. Souces say that Spears took shopping matters into her own hands on Tuesday afternoon at Le Bra Lingerie, and splurged 3,000 dollars on underthings.(ANI)
- dudepoker171
by puckhead23 » Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:39 pm
johnny wrote:How did I know this thread would attract Puckhead?
LMFAO...and it attracted me a 2nd time. You know me well!!!
-
puckhead23 - Shark
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:09 am
by randy72560 » Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:49 am
Lol, sweet! I seem to miss the classic posts somehow. 
Thanks Mew.
Thanks Mew.-
randy72560 - Moderator
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:38 pm
21 posts • Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
